Diagnostic challenges with accurate identification of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from food and environmental samples in South Africa

African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Diagnostic challenges with accurate identification of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from food and environmental samples in South Africa
 
Creator Thomas, Teena S.M. Thomas, Juno le Roux, Karren Duze, Sanelisiwe T. Mkhwanazi, Faith Duse, Adriano
 
Subject Food microbiology Listeria monocytogenes; food; environmental samples; diagnostic challenges; Africa
Description Background: The 2017–2018 listeriosis outbreak in South Africa warranted testing for Listeria monocytogenes in food products and processing environments. Diagnostic tests are needed to accurately differentiate L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.Objective: The study assessed the performance of the commonly used tests in our setting to accurately identify L. monocytogenes.Methods: The study was conducted in a public health laboratory in South Africa. Cultured isolates from food and environmental samples were tested both prospectively and retrospectively between August 2018 and December 2018. Isolates were phenotypically identified using tests for detecting β-haemolysis, Christie-Atkins-Munch-Peterson, alanine arylamidase (AlaA), mannosidase, and xylose fermentation. Listeria monocytogenes isolates were identified using automated systems, Microscan Walkaway Plus 96, Vitek® MS, Vitek® 2 and Surefast Listeria monocytogenes PLUS PCR. All results were compared to whole-genome sequencing results.Results: β-haemolysis and Christie-Atkins-Munch-Peterson tests gave delayed positivity or were negative for L. monocytogenes and falsely positive for one strain of Listeria innocua. The AlaA enzyme and Colorex Listeria agar lacked specificity for L. monocytogenes identification. Based on a few phenotypic test results, an aberrant L. monocytogenes strain and Listeria seeligeri strain were reported. All automated platforms overcalled L. monocytogenes in place of other Listeria species.Conclusion: No test was ideal in differentiating Listeria species. This is an issue in resource-limited settings where these tests are currently used. Newer technologies based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and other molecular techniques specific to L. monocytogenes detection need to be investigated. 
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2022-05-23
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1482
 
Source African Journal of Laboratory Medicine; Vol 11, No 1 (2022); 6 pages 2225-2010 2225-2002
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2215 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2216 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2217 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2219 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2220 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2221 https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/1482/2218
 
Coverage Low-middle income countries — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Teena S.M. Thomas, Juno Thomas, Karren le Roux, Sanelisiwe T. Duze, Faith Mkhwanazi, Adriano Duse https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT