Formation of professionalism: A courtship between academic staff and prospective clinical associates

Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Formation of professionalism: A courtship between academic staff and prospective clinical associates
 
Creator Du Toit, Pieter H. Tshotetsi, Lumbani Carvalio-Zongo, Sabatine Olifant, Melissa Mpholo, Bonolo Louw, Murray
 
Subject Higher education; health sciences education; academic staff development clinical associates; early-career academics; participatory action research; professionalism; scholarly community of practice; scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL); self-study; thinking preferences; Whole Brain® thinking
Description Background: The study was conducted to the background of a qualification in medical clinical practice offered at a Faculty of Health Sciences at a university in South Africa.Aim: The aim of the study was to determine how the theory of Whole Brain® thinking informed our professionalism and its relevance to transforming self and practice.Setting: The study was conducted in the context of a higher education institution, the University of Pretoria. The focus is specifically on the Bachelor of Clinical Medical Practice (BCMP). It has been offered since 2009.Methods: Participatory action research was the design of choice. The participatory part culminated in working as a collective in a scholarly community of practice. What is reported is the use of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument® (HBDI®) as a research instrument. It was used to determine the thinking preferences of the lecturers. Each lecturer obtained their brain profile that served as baseline data for self-study in the future. The profiling revealed their strengths and areas that they needed to work on – as individuals and as a team.Results: The theory of Whole Brain® thinking was identified as an enabler towards transforming self and practice. This transformation involved both lecturers and prospective clinical associates.Conclusion: The value of the study mainly lies in the development of the professionalism of the lecturers. Linked to professionalism is the value of using the theory of Whole Brain® thinking that primarily informed the teaching practice of the lecturers. And secondary to this, the students’ authentic clinical practice, which included patients and simulated practice where peers act as patients. The study contributed to the scholarship of teaching and learning in a medical clinical context and to participatory action research – both interrogated from a Whole Brain® perspective for the first time in the context in question.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria
Date 2022-04-28
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Participatory action research; thinking preferences questionnaire: Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI)
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/td.v18i1.1174
 
Source The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa; Vol 18, No 1 (2022); 13 pages 2415-2005 1817-4434
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/1174/2078 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/1174/2079 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/1174/2080 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/1174/2081
 
Coverage — — Professionals in health sciences education
Rights Copyright (c) 2022 Pieter H. du Toit, Lumbani Tshotetsi, Sabatine Carvalio-Zongo, Melissa Olifant, Bonolo Mpholo, Murray Louw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT