Alternative mechanisms for delivery of medication in South Africa: A scoping review

South African Family Practice

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Alternative mechanisms for delivery of medication in South Africa: A scoping review
 
Creator Mash, Robert Christian, Carmen Chigwanda, Ruvimbo V.
 
Subject family medicine primary health care; primary care; medication systems; adherence clubs, home delivery; alternative pick-up-points
Description Background: The number of people in South Africa with chronic conditions is a challenge to the health system. In response to the coronavirus infection, health services in Cape Town introduced home delivery of medication by community health workers. In planning for the future, they requested a scoping review of alternative mechanisms for delivery of medication to patients in primary health care in South Africa.Methods: Databases were systematically searched using a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies from the last 10 years. A methodological guideline for conducting scoping reviews was followed. A standardised template was used to extract data and compare study characteristics and findings. Data was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively.Results: A total of 4253 publications were identified and 26 included. Most publications were from the last 5 years (n = 21), research (n = 24), Western Cape (n = 15) and focused on adherence clubs (n = 17), alternative pick-up-points (n = 14), home delivery (n = 5) and HIV (n = 17). The majority of alternative mechanisms were supported by a centralised dispensing and packaging system. New technology such as smart lockers and automated pharmacy dispensing units have been piloted. Patients benefited from these alternatives and had improved adherence. Available evidence suggests alternative mechanisms were cheaper and more beneficial than attending the facility to collect medication.Conclusion: A mix of options tailored to the local context and patient choice that can be adequately managed by the system would be ideal. More economic evaluations are required of the alternatives, particularly before going to scale and for newer technology.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Metro Health Services, Western Cape Government
Date 2021-08-24
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Review
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/safp.v63i1.5274
 
Source South African Family Practice; Vol 63, No 1 (2021): Part 3; 8 pages 2078-6204 2078-6190
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5274/6866 https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5274/6867 https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5274/6868 https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5274/6869
 
Coverage South Africa 2011-2020 —
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Robert Mash, Carmen Christian, Ruvimbo Valerie Chigwanda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT