Well-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participants

Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Well-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participants
 
Creator Sebeco, Lebogang Zaaiman, Johan
 
Subject Sociology; Sociology of Education; Education igher education institutions; North-West University; community engagement; collaboration; Vaalharts; WIN platform projects; Context–Focus–Profile model; silo, intersectional and infusion models.
Description Community engagement referred to approaches in which communities were involved in activities that positively impacted their lives. Currently, higher education institutions have community engagement high on their agenda. This article focussed on how this engagement ought to be managed through the responses of community members to such an intervention. It presented community members’ evaluative perceptions on the North-West University’s (NWU) well-being innovation (WIN) platform projects in the Vaalharts community. This research was qualitative and a case study design was followed. Through interviews and focus groups, the perceptions of participants of the WIN platform projects were obtained. The data used stemmed from empirical research by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) and the researchers. Although this study could reach only a limited number of project participants, they provided valuable insights into the ways they had experienced the projects. Guided by the Context–Focus–Profile model, a comprehensive evaluation framework was constructed for the interview and focus groups’ schedules. The findings indicated that the community members had positive perceptions of the projects, which had contributed most especially to skills and self-development. However, as members of a poor community, such people are vulnerable. To ensure that they feel respected and that projects fit their needs to ensure long-lasting benefits, the way in which community engagement was conducted was important. Recommendations for improvement emerging from this study focussed on collaboration, communication, monitoring and recruitment. This article thereby contributed to the debate about higher education institutions’ involvement in community engagement and demonstrated the value of using the Context–Focus–Profile model for evaluation purposes.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research National Research Foundation Human Science Research Council
Date 2021-04-28
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Case study
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/td.v17i1.950
 
Source The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa; Vol 17, No 1 (2021); 12 pages 2415-2005 1817-4434
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/950/1709 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/950/1708 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/950/1711 https://td-sa.net/index.php/td/article/view/950/1707
 
Coverage South Africa; Vaalharts — Participation
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Lebogang Sebeco, Johan Zaaiman https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT