Remarks on the use of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients in assessing relationships in ophthalmic data

African Vision and Eye Health

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Remarks on the use of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients in assessing relationships in ophthalmic data
 
Creator Alsaqr, Ali M.
 
Subject Ophthalmology, Optometry, Eye vision, Statistics correlation; Pearson’s; Spearman’s; statistics; ocular; eye; vision; ophthalmology; optometry
Description Background: A correlation coefficient is a measure of a relationship between any two quantitative and categorical variables. The coefficient describes the degree of relationship between two variables. Associated variables change in tandem – a change in one variable, and the second changes in the same or opposite direction. Correlation is a commonly used statistical procedure. Medical studies use this test widely to explore diagnosis, prognosis and predicting normative parameters for reference measurements. This test is not uncommon in the ophthalmic field, and many studies in the literature used this statistical procedure. However, in some studies, the interpretation of this test was incorrect, possibly because of the test being partially misunderstood.Aim: This study aims to review articles that used those statistic tests to provide an overview of correlation coefficient tests, their indications and interpretations. Correlation analyses and interpretations in ophthalmic data studies are also discussed.Methods: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed and correlation studies that explored ophthalmic data were searched, investigated and reviewed. This review covered a span over the period published between 1990–2020.Results: This critical review included 64 papers. The papers were directed to investigate many variables, for example, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, dry eye, myopia, retina and low vision. Some of those papers found significant results while the others did not report any. Their reporting and interpretation of the correlation coefficient varied widely.Conclusion: The studies reviewed suggested that there is a need for reporting, in every single study, the normality of the data, r-value, p-value and the extent of the shared variance between investigated outcomes. Lastly, the clinical implications of those studies findings are recommended to be stated clearly.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor King Saud University
Date 2021-04-21
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Review
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/aveh.v80i1.612
 
Source African Vision and Eye Health; Vol 80, No 1 (2021); 10 pages 2410-1516 2413-3183
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/612/1466 https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/612/1465 https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/612/1468 https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/612/1464
 
Coverage Worldwide 1980-2020 Relationships in Ophthalmic Data
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 M ALSAQR https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT