‘Between righteousness and alms’ in Tobit: What was the author’s real intention?

HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies

 
 
Field Value
 
Title ‘Between righteousness and alms’ in Tobit: What was the author’s real intention?
 
Creator Evans, Annette H.
 
Subject Ancient Near Eastern Literature; Apocrypha; Tobit 4QTobit; Semitic Tobit; Septuagint; Tobit GI; Tobit GII; Qumran; Fitzmyer 1995; Righteousness; Almsgiving
Description Before the Semitic fragments of 4QTobit were found at Qumran, the 4th-century Greek GI version of Tobit was thought to be original and was regarded as ‘a lesson on almsgiving and its redeeming powers’. In his presentation of the 4Q196–4Q199 (Aramaic) and 4Q200 (Hebrew) fragments of Tobit, Fitzmyer, in 1995, reconstructed and rendered the Semitic lexeme צדקה (literally, ‘righteousness’) as ‘almsgiving’, as in Mishnaic Hebrew. He referred mainly to the 4th-century Common Era Greek and Old Latin versions. The hypothesis of this article is that the Aramaic lexeme צדק may not yet have had the meaning of ‘almsgiving’ in the original composition; thus, the original authorial intention may be masked in Fitzmyer’s presentation. Therefore, the emphasis on almsgiving for ultimate personal gain found in the later copies of Tobit may be a secondary, reductionist application by subsequent scribes of the lexeme צדקה. To test this hypothesis, the relevant reconstructions and English translations as ‘almsgiving’ of the Semitic copies of Tobit found at Qumran are examined and reconsidered. In the beginning of the narrative, in 4Q196 (and in GI and GII) the rather self-righteous Tobit is ‘accidentally’ blinded while performing an act of charity to his own kin, which he believed was the way to gain righteousness and thus be rewarded by God. In the end, when he has recovered his sight, Tobit redefines the way to achieve true righteousness: to bless God and extol his majesty to all nations with truthfulness in heart and soul.Contribution: The comparison of the Semitic fragments from Qumran with the Septuagint versions suggests that the first reconstructions and translations of 4QTobit may have been overly influenced by the long-standing Greek versions. Whereas the Greek versions tend to emphasise almsgiving as a means to gain righteousness, the older Aramaic versions tend to highlight righteousness and truthfulness as the primary value.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of the Free State
Date 2020-09-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Textual criticism
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/hts.v76i4.6136
 
Source HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies; Vol 76, No 4 (2020); 7 pages 2072-8050 0259-9422
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6136/15968 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6136/15967 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6136/15969 https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6136/15966
 
Coverage Ancient Near East Second Temple Period Ancient Jewish; Aramaic
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Annette H. Evans https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT