Dynamic strategy: Investigating the ambidexterity–performance relationship

South African Journal of Business Management

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Dynamic strategy: Investigating the ambidexterity–performance relationship
 
Creator Jacobs, Madeleine Maritz, Rachel
 
Subject Strategy sustainable performance; ambidexterity; dynamic strategy; dynamic capabilities; environmental turbulence.
Description Purpose: This study aims to determine whether organisations in emerging economic contexts demonstrate ambidexterity for sustainable performance in the long term and what the effects of environmental turbulence are on the ambidexterity and sustainable performance relationship.Design/methodology/approach: This study used self-administered questionnaires and telephonic surveys. The sample consisted of profit-seeking organisations from many different industries within South Africa, including, but not limited to, manufacturing, business services, finance, hospitality and tourism, and retail and wholesale. The research was conducted during the 2017 financial year.Findings/results: It was found that moderate to strong relationships exist between the two sub-dimensions of ambidexterity and sustainable performance. The findings depict a strong relationship between exploration and exploitation as the sub-dimensional constructs of ambidexterity, reinforcing existing literature on simultaneous exploration and exploitation. There was no statistically significant information, indicating that environmental turbulence moderates the ambidexterity and sustainable performance relationship.Practical implications: Considering the strong positive relationship between the two sub-dimensions of ambidexterity and sustainable organisational performance, it is advisable for management of South African organisations to focus on ambidextrous strategies for sustaining performance in turbulent environments.Originality/value: This study contributes to the limited body of knowledge investigating ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in an emerging economic context. Moreover, this study contributes to clarify the ambidexterity and sustainable performance relationship in terms of whether organisations can simultaneously explore and exploit and what type of relationship exists between ambidexterity and sustainable performance as previous studies delivered mixed results.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2020-03-09
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1643
 
Source South African Journal of Business Management; Vol 51, No 1 (2020); 14 pages 2078-5976 2078-5585
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1643/1503 https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1643/1502 https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1643/1504 https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1643/1501
 
Coverage — — A non-probability sampling method (Convenience), profit seeking firms from various industries operating within the South African business environment,
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Madeleine Jacobs, Rachel Maritz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT