The logframe as a monitoring and evaluation tool for government interventions in a chaotic and complex environment

Africa's Public Service Delivery and Performance Review

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The logframe as a monitoring and evaluation tool for government interventions in a chaotic and complex environment
 
Creator Uwizeyimana, Dominique E.
 
Subject forth industrial revolution; public policy; monitoring and evaluation logframe; logic model; monitoring and evaluation; public policy; government interventions.
Description Background: The logical framework approach (or logframe) as a tool for the monitoring and evaluation (ME) of government interventions has gained popularity in ME scholarly research. The term ‘interventions’ as used in this article refers to public policy, strategies, programmes and projects that are implemented by governments to address the socio-economic problems affecting the citizens.Aim: The aim of this article was to assess the logframe as an ME tool for government interventions in Africa and to close the knowledge gap in the current literature.Setting: The logframe is currently used (in one form or another) by most multilateral and bilateral aid agencies that are operating as development partners across the Africa. Its popular use ignores the fact that the success and failure of government interventions do not follow a pre-deterministic logical sequence of events.Methods: This research is qualitative and is based on a robust review of the existing literature on the use of the logframe in ME and the theory of chaos and complexity.Results: This article shows that government interventions are generally implemented and evaluated in a dynamic, ever-changing, complex and often chaotic environment.Conclusion: Because of the dynamic, complex nature of the environment in which government interventions are implemented and evaluated, the logframe should be continuously adjusted to accommodate changes in the environment. In addition, its use in ME should be limited to the level at which the changes on the evaluand and in the environment allow a certain level of stability, predictability and logic.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2020-01-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Literary Analysis
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/apsdpr.v8i1.328
 
Source Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review; Vol 8, No 1 (2020); 12 pages 2310-2152 2310-2195
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/328/524 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/328/523 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/328/525 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/328/522
 
Coverage Africa — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Dominique E. Uwizeyimana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT