Accuracy of plain radiographs in diagnosing biopsy-proven malignant bone lesions

SA Journal of Radiology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Accuracy of plain radiographs in diagnosing biopsy-proven malignant bone lesions
 
Creator Gerber, Erhardt Said-Hartley, Qonita Gamieldien, Rufkah Hartley, Tharbit Candy, Sally
 
Subject — bone tumours; radiopathological correlation; plain film findings; bone tumour biopsy; histology results.
Description Background: The diagnosis of primary bone tumours is a three-fold approach based on a combination of clinical, radiological and histopathological findings. Radiographs form an integral part in the initial diagnosis, staging and treatment planning for the management of aggressive/malignant bone lesions. Few studies have been performed where the radiologist’s interpretation of radiographs is compared with the histopathological diagnosis.Objectives: The study aimed to determine the frequency of bone tumours at a tertiary hospital in South Africa, and, using a systematic approach, to determine the sensitivity and specificity of radiograph interpretation in the diagnosis of aggressive bone lesions, correlating with histopathology. We also determined the inter-observer agreement in radiograph interpretation, calculated the positive and negative predictive values for aggressive/malignant bone tumours and computed the cumulative effect of multiple radiological signs to determine the yield for malignant bone tumours.Method: A retrospective, descriptive and correlational study was performed, reviewing the histopathological reports of all biopsies performed on suspected aggressive bone lesions during a 3-year period from 2012 to 2014. The radiographs were interpreted by three radiologists using predetermined criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the readers’ interpretation of the radiograph as ‘benign/non-aggressive’ or ‘aggressive/malignant’ were calculated against the histology, and the inter-rater agreement of the readers was computed using the Fleiss kappa values.Results: Of the 88 suspected ‘aggressive or malignant’ bone tumours that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 43 were infective or malignant and 45 were benign lesions at histology. Reader sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy/infective bone lesions ranged from 93% to 98% with a specificity of 53% – 73%. The average kappa value of 0.43 showed moderate agreement between radiological interpretation and final histology results. The four radiological signs with the highest positive predictive values were an ill-defined border, wide zone of transition, cortical destruction and malignant periosteal reaction. The presence of all four signs on radiography had a 100% yield for a malignant bone tumour or infective lesion.Conclusion: The use of a systemic approach in the interpretation of bone lesions on radiographs yields high sensitivity but low specificity for malignancy and infection. The presence of benign bone lesions with an aggressive radiographic appearance necessitates continuation of the triple approach for the diagnosis of primary bone tumours.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2019-12-06
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajr.v23i1.1768
 
Source South African Journal of Radiology; Vol 23, No 1 (2019); 7 pages 2078-6778 1027-202X
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1768/2396 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1768/2395 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1768/2397 https://sajr.org.za/index.php/sajr/article/view/1768/2394
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Erhardt Gerber, Qonita Said-Hartley, Rufkah Gamieldien, Tharbit Hartley, Sally Candy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT