Even we are important: Sexuality and the degenderisation of people with disabilities in the linguistic landscapes of two South African universities in the Western Cape province

African Journal of Disability

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Even we are important: Sexuality and the degenderisation of people with disabilities in the linguistic landscapes of two South African universities in the Western Cape province
 
Creator Adekunle, Temitope O. Mheta, Gift Rapeane-Mathonsi, Maleshoane
 
Subject Humanities; Education linguistic landscaping; critical discourse analysis; multimodality; sexual orientation; South African universities; interpretive paradigm; degenderisation; people with disabilities; signs; images; texts; billboards; posters
Description Background: This study focuses on the positioning of gender, sexual orientation and people with disabilities in the linguistic landscapes of two selected South African universities, which are located in the Western Cape province.Objectives: This study aims to answer the question: How are power relations depicted through linguistic landscaping in the universities?Methods: Given that there is minimal empirical data in this field, the researcher approached this question by exploring the way in which sexual orientation and people with disabilities are perceived, via the modal resources used in the categorisation of toilet users at the institutions. Specifically, toilet signage was observed as there were only a few other signage or forms of support (such as ramps and lifts – some of which may seem disability-unfriendly in terms of space) and acknowledgement in other places at the institutions for people with disabilities. Data (signs, images, texts, billboards and posters) were collected by means of photography. The interpretive paradigm was used to determine the choice of methodology: critical discourse analysis and multimodality. These were also used to thematically analyse the collected data.Results: Findings revealed that sexuality, as well as subtle inequality, unfortunately remain unravelled areas in South Africa’s higher institutions of learning. In addition, the degenderisation of people with disabilities appears to be prevalent at the institutions, although this may not necessarily be reflective of practices at all higher education institutions in South Africa.Conclusion: Nonetheless, the examined results are stimulating indicators of hegemonic and preferred practices in public places. They also depict the obtainable dissimilar scales and imbalances in society, which are not addressed may impede other authentic and ongoing measures of social integration and advancement.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Durban University of Technology University of Cape Town University of the Western Cape
Date 2019-11-22
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — qualitative research
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.568
 
Source African Journal of Disability; Vol 8 (2019); 12 pages 2226-7220 2223-9170
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/568/1258 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/568/1257 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/568/1259 https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/568/1256
 
Coverage Africa; South Africa; Western Cape 2018 Linguistic/modal resources
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Temitope O. Adekunle, Gift Mheta, Maleshoane Rapeane-Mathonsi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT