Evaluating invasion risk for freshwater fishes in South Africa

Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Evaluating invasion risk for freshwater fishes in South Africa
 
Creator Marr, Sean M. Ellender, Bruce R. Woodford, Darragh J. Alexander, Mhairi E. Wasserman, Ryan J. Ivey, Philip Zengeya, Tsungai Weyl, Olaf L.F.
 
Subject — aquaculture; establishment; FISK; ornamental fish; risk assessment; sport fishes
Description Background: South Africa, as a signatory of the Convention on Biological Diversity, has an obligation to identify, prioritise and manage invasive species and their introduction pathways. However, this requires knowledge of the introduction pathways, factors influencing establishment success, invasive potential, current distributions and ecological impacts. Objectives: To evaluate the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) to predict the invasion risk posed by fish species proposed for introduction into South Africa. Method: FISK assessments were compiled for species whose invasion status in South Africa was known. A Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to calibrate the FISK for South Africa. The calibrated FISK was used to evaluate the risk that three species recently proposed for importation for aquaculture could become invasive in South Africa. Results: A FISK score of 14 was identified as the threshold to delineate between species that could become invasive in South Africa and those that are unlikely to become invasive. Of the three species evaluated, Silurus glanis had a high risk of becoming invasive in South Africa, Lates calcarifer was likely to be invasive and Oncorhynchus tshawytscha was unlikely to be invasive in South Africa. Conclusion: FISK was demonstrated to be a useful risk assessment tool to evaluate the invasion risk posed by species proposed for use in aquaculture. For the large number of fish imported for the pet trade, a rapid screening assessment to flag potentially high risk species was recommended prior to a full FISK assessment for flagged species.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2017-03-31
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2177
 
Source Bothalia; Vol 47, No 2 (2017); 10 pages 2311-9284 0006-8241
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://journals.abcjournal.aosis.co.za/index.php/abc/article/view/2177/2202 https://journals.abcjournal.aosis.co.za/index.php/abc/article/view/2177/2201 https://journals.abcjournal.aosis.co.za/index.php/abc/article/view/2177/2203 https://journals.abcjournal.aosis.co.za/index.php/abc/article/view/2177/2144
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Sean M. Marr, Bruce R. Ellender, Darragh J. Woodford, Mhairi E. Alexander, Ryan J. Wasserman, Philip Ivey, Tsungai Zengeya, Olaf L.F. Weyl https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT