Assessing the role of local institutions in participatory development: The case of Khwee and Sehunong settlements in Botswana

Africa's Public Service Delivery and Performance Review

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Assessing the role of local institutions in participatory development: The case of Khwee and Sehunong settlements in Botswana
 
Creator Molosi- France, Keneilwe Dipholo, Kenneth
 
Subject Community Development; Public Administration rural development; poverty; Village Development Committees; Khwee; Sehunong; participatory development theory
Description Many governments in Africa give priority to rural development mainly because a significant proportion of their populations live in the rural areas where poverty is severe. Thus, one of the goals of rural development is to address the problem of poverty in the rural areas with an emphasis on promoting participation of people in decisions that affect them. The Village Development Committee (VDC) is a village-level institution that is responsible for ensuring that the community actively participates in the development process in order to promote grassroot development. Essentially, VDCs have been established to offer a forum for community engagement in the processes that concern their development with a view to promote a sense of responsibility, commitment and ownership by the community. This discussion is informed by a qualitative study that used semi-structured interviews to gather data. Two findings pertaining to the weak role of the VDC and unequal power relations are seen to be hindering community participation. As such, this paper argues that VDCs in Khwee and Sehunong settlements do not serve their intended purpose of engaging the community as other stakeholders pay lip service to community participation, hence not fully involving the VDC. The paper recommends that the Government of Botswana as the main stakeholder in national development, including the development of San communities, should commit to genuine community participation, while on the other hand the San should be empowered so that they can embrace and demand to be involved in their own development.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor University of Botswana
Date 2017-10-02
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Qualitative
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/apsdpr.v5i1.181
 
Source Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review; Vol 5, No 1 (2017); 8 pages 2310-2152 2310-2195
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/181/220 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/181/219 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/181/221 https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/181/210
 
Coverage Botswana 2015-2017 Ethnicity
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Keneilwe Molosi- France, Kenneth Dipholo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT