The Impact and Dilemma of Unfunded Mandates Confronting Local Government South Africa: A Comparative Analysis

Africa's Public Service Delivery and Performance Review

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The Impact and Dilemma of Unfunded Mandates Confronting Local Government South Africa: A Comparative Analysis
 
Creator Basdeo, M.
 
Subject — Local Government; Unfunded Mandates; Service Delivery; South Africa
Description Local government has emerged from a prolonged transition to face a second generation of challenges, namely unfunded mandates. Compliance with the current financial management system is a constant challenge for local government. To complicate matters local government is challenged by the dilemma of unfunded mandates which are an extreme manifestation of the phenomenon of governing from the centre. National government through various strategies imposes national mandates on provincial and local government at the expense of the latter. The incidence of unfunded mandate reflects a power hierarchy. Unfunded mandates are generally a significant indicator of the relative weakness of national government because it is often local government occupying constitutionally and politically the weakest position in the hierarchy that is burdened with new responsibilities. In decentralised and federal government systems, provincial/state and local governments object to unfunded mandates because they shrink their policy space, limit their expenditure choices and ultimately local government’s accountability to their electorates. Further, these systems of governance establish a hierarchy of authority that creates  notions of self-rule by national government. Unfunded mandates reflect systemic weaknesses of decentralised or federal allocation of powers and functions. Although there are principled objections, unfunded mandates remain constitutional. Given the wide incidence of unfunded mandates the critical question arises as to how in a decentralised system, one level of government can impose mandates with cost implications on another. How is it constitutionally justifiable?
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2012-09-01
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/apsdpr.v1i2.30
 
Source Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review; Vol 1, No 2 (2012); 51-66 2310-2152 2310-2195
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/30/29
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2012 M. Basdeo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT