The impact of social grant dependency on smallholder maize producers’ market participation in South Africa: Application of the double-hurdle model
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
| Field | Value | |
| Title | The impact of social grant dependency on smallholder maize producers’ market participation in South Africa: Application of the double-hurdle model | |
| Creator | Sinyolo, Sikhulumile Mudhara, Maxwell Wale, Edilegnaw | |
| Description | Background: Social grants have become an increasingly popular means of improving the welfare of poor households in South Africa and beyond. While the goals of these transfers are to alleviate current poverty as well as to improve human capital capacity, they also have unintended effects, positive or negative, on beneficiary households. A question that has not been adequately addressed in the literature is the role that social grants play in the efforts to commercialise smallholder farming.Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of social grant dependency on the incentives of smallholder maize producers to participate in the market.Setting: The study was done in the rural areas of four districts (Harry Gwala, Umzinyathi, Umkhanyakude and Uthukela) in the KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.Methods: The study adopted a quantitative research design. A total of 984 households were randomly selected from the four districts, of which 774 had planted maize in the previous season. The analysis was done on the 774 farmers who had planted maize. The double-hurdle model was used for statistical analysis.Results: The results show a negative association between social grant dependency and market participation, suggesting that social grant-dependent households are more subsistent, producing less marketable surplus. Moreover, households with access to social grants sold less quantities of maize in the market, indicating reduced selling incentives.Conclusion: The study indicates that social grants reduce the incentives of smallholder farmers to commercialise their production activities. The results suggest that, while policies aimed at reducing transaction costs would increase smallholder market participation, attention should be paid on how to reduce social grants’ dis-incentive effects. To reduce spill over effects to unintended household members, the study recommends offering part of the grant as ‘in-kind support’, which is specific to the intended individual beneficiary. | |
| Publisher | AOSIS Publishing | |
| Date | 2017-05-26 | |
| Identifier | 10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1474 | |
| Source | South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences; Vol 20, No 1 (2017); 10 pages 2222-3436 1015-8812 | |
| Language | eng | |
| Relation |
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:
https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1474/819
https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1474/818
https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1474/820
https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1474/813
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
