Immunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa

Journal of the South African Veterinary Association

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Immunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa
 
Creator Simpson, Gregory J.G. Marcotty, Tanguy Rouille, Elodie Chilundo, Abel Letteson, Jean-Jacques Godfroid, Jacques
 
Subject immunology; microbiology; veterinary science brucellosis; communal; cattle; vaccination; S19; serology; skin test
Description Brucellosis is of worldwide economic and public health importance. Heifer vaccination with live attenuated Brucella abortus strain 19 (S19) is the cornerstone of control in low- and middle-income countries. Antibody persistence induced by S19 is directly correlated with the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per dose. There are two vaccination methods: a ‘high’ dose (5–8 × 1010 CFU) subcutaneously injected or one or two ‘low’ doses (5 × 109 CFU) through the conjunctival route. This study aimed to evaluate serological reactions to the ‘high’ dose and possible implications of the serological findings on disease control. This study included 58 female cases, vaccinated at Day 0, and 29 male controls. Serum was drawn repeatedly and tested for Brucella antibodies using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The cases showed a rapid antibody response with peak RBT positivity (98%) at 2 weeks and iELISA (95%) at 8 weeks, then decreased in an inverse logistic curve to 14% RBT and 32% iELISA positive at 59 weeks and at 4.5 years 57% (4/7 cases) demonstrated a persistent immune response (RBT, iELISA or Brucellin skin test) to Brucella spp. Our study is the first of its kind documenting the persistence of antibodies in an African communal farming setting for over a year to years after ‘high’ dose S19 vaccination, which can be difficult to differentiate from a response to infection with wild-type B. abortus. A recommendation could be using a ‘low’ dose or different route of vaccination.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor Belgium Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Pretoria, Mpumalanga Veterinary Services
Date 2018-03-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Vaccine cohort study
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527
 
Source Journal of the South African Veterinary Association; Vol 89 (2018); 7 pages 2224-9435 1019-9128
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://jsava.co.za/index.php/jsava/article/view/1527/2051 https://jsava.co.za/index.php/jsava/article/view/1527/2050 https://jsava.co.za/index.php/jsava/article/view/1527/2052 https://jsava.co.za/index.php/jsava/article/view/1527/2049
 
Coverage Mpumalanga; South Africa — cattle
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Gregory J.G. Simpson, Tanguy Marcotty, Elodie Rouille, Abel Chilundo, Jean-Jacques Letteson, Jacques Godfroid https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT