Population ecology of vervet monkeys in a high latitude, semi-arid riparian woodland

Koedoe - African Protected Area Conservation and Science

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Population ecology of vervet monkeys in a high latitude, semi-arid riparian woodland
 
Creator Pasternak, Graham Brown, Leslie R. Kienzle, Stefan Fuller, Andrea Barrett, Louise Henzi, S. Peter
 
Subject Primatology; Behavioural Ecology Home range; day journey length; diet; group size; territoriality
Description Narrow riparian woodlands along non-perennial streams have made it possible for vervet monkeys to penetrate the semi-arid karoo ecosystem of South Africa, whilst artificial water points have more recently allowed these populations to colonize much more marginal habitat away from natural water sources. In order to better understand the sequelae of life in these narrow, linear woodlands for historically ‘natural’ populations and to test the prediction that they are ecologically stressed, we determined the size of troops in relation to their reliance on natural and artificial water sources and collected detailed data from two river-centred troops on activity, diet and ranging behaviour over an annual cycle. In comparison to other populations, our data indicate that river-centred troops in the karoo were distinctive primarily both for their large group sizes and, consequently, their large adult cohorts, and in the extent of home range overlap in what is regarded as a territorial species. Whilst large group size carried the corollary of increased day journey length and longer estimated interbirth intervals, there was little other indication of the effects of ecological stress on factors such as body weight and foraging effort. We argue that this was a consequence of the high density of Acacia karroo, which accounted for a third of annual foraging effort in what was a relatively depauperate floristic habitat. We ascribed the large group size and home range overlap to constraints on group fission.Conservation implications: The distribution of group sizes, sampled appropriately across habitats within a conservation area, will be of more relevance to management than average values, which may be nothing more than a statistical artefact, especially when troop sizes are bimodally distributed.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor NRF (South Africa) UNISA (South Africa) NSERC (Canada)
Date 2013-02-20
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Plot methods; observation;
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1078
 
Source Koedoe; Vol 55, No 1 (2013); 9 pages 2071-0771 0075-6458
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1078/1442 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1078/1443 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1078/1444 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1078/1441
 
Coverage Africa; protected areas Current Habituated groups, total counts; species richness
Rights Copyright (c) 2013 Graham Pasternak, Leslie R. Brown, Stefan Kienzle, Andrea Fuller, Louise Barrett, S. Peter Henzi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT