First-language raters’ opinions when validating word recordings for a newly developed speech reception threshold test

South African Journal of Communication Disorders

 
 
Field Value
 
Title First-language raters’ opinions when validating word recordings for a newly developed speech reception threshold test
 
Creator Panday, Seema Kathard, Harsha Pillay, Mershen Wilson, Wayne
 
Subject audiology test methods; test words; audiology
Description Background: The purpose of this study was to consider the value of adding first-language speaker ratings to the process of validating word recordings for use in a new speech reception threshold (SRT) test in audiology. Previous studies had identified 28 word recordings as being suitable for use in a new SRT test. These word recordings had been shown to satisfy the linguistic criteria of familiarity, phonetic dissimilarity and tone, and the psychometric criterion of homogeneity of audibility. Objectives: The aim of the study was to consider the value of adding first-language speakers’ ratings when validating word recordings for a new SRT test. Method: A single observation, cross-sectional design was used to collect and analyse quantitative data in this study. Eleven first-language isiZulu speakers, purposively selected, were asked to rate each of the word recordings for pitch, clarity, naturalness, speech rate and quality on a 5-point Likert scale. The percent agreement and Friedman test were used for analysis. Results: More than 20% of these 11 participants rated the three-word recordings below ‘strongly agree’ in the category of pitch or tone, and one-word recording below ‘strongly agree’ in the categories of pitch or tone, clarity or articulation and naturalness or dialect. Conclusion: The first-language speaker ratings proved to be a valuable addition to the process of selecting word recordings for use in a new SRT test. In particular, these ratings identified potentially problematic word recordings in the new SRT test that had been missed by the previously and more commonly used linguistic and psychometric selection criteria.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor None
Date 2018-03-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — observational
Format text/html application/epub+zip application/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajcd.v65i1.555
 
Source South African Journal of Communication Disorders; Vol 65, No 1 (2018); 6 pages 2225-4765 0379-8046
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/555/782 https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/555/781 https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/555/783 https://sajcd.org.za/index.php/sajcd/article/view/555/780
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Seema Panday, Harsha Kathard, Mershen Pillay, Wayne Wilson https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT