Stretching between learning and accountability: Experiences of South African non-governmental organisations

African Evaluation Journal

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Stretching between learning and accountability: Experiences of South African non-governmental organisations
 
Creator Kachur, Dzvinka Soal, Sue Van Blerk, Rubert
 
Subject — Organisational learning; monitoring and evaluation; organisation capacity development
Description This article contributes to knowledge around organisational learning in relation to Monitoring and Evaluation (ME) processes of non-governmental organisations (NGOs).While learning and accountability are two fundamental purposes of ME, in practice NGOs often perceive donor accountability as the only function of their organisation’s ME system. Learning through meaningful monitoring of actions is a necessary process to satisfy effective functioning of organisations working on social change.The article is based on action research, which included qualitative methods such as case studies, focus group interview(s), semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with participating organisations from an 18-month Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity Development Programme of the Community Development Resource Association, which involved nine South African NGOs. Organisations benefited from the programme through peer learning, consulting and research linked to the programme.The research revealed that NGOs have a perception of ME as an accountability procedure that has been imposed on them by donor communities and are resistant to it as well as to rigid data collection.Organisations require specific capacities to realise their power and to be able to negotiate more developmental approaches to ME within their organisations and with donors. The model is suggested that fosters learning in ME systems and includes two interlinked processes: self-awareness (a sense of core organisational values and intuitive ability) and awareness about the outside world and the effects of organisations’ work.The model for ME systems can be explored further and help those organisations who are working towards better balance between learning and accountability.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2016-06-10
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/aej.v4i1.71
 
Source African Evaluation Journal; Vol 4, No 1 (2016); 11 pages 2306-5133 2310-4988
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/71/259 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/71/260 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/71/261 https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/71/256
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Dzvinka Kachur, Sue Soal, Rubert Van Blerk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT