Foraging range and habitat use by Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres from the Msikaba colony, Eastern Cape province, South Africa

Koedoe - African Protected Area Conservation and Science

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Foraging range and habitat use by Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres from the Msikaba colony, Eastern Cape province, South Africa
 
Creator Pfeiffer, Morgan B. Venter, Jan A. Downs, Colleen T.
 
Subject Conservation, Ecology, Gyps coprotheres, foraging range, land use, communal farmland, buffers, vulture
Description Despite the extent of subsistence farmland in Africa, little is known about endangered species that persist within them. The Cape Vulture (Gyps coprotheres) is regionally endangered in southern Africa and at least 20% of the population breeds in the subsistence farmland area previously known as the Transkei in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. To understand their movement ecology, adult Cape Vultures (n = 9) were captured and fitted with global positioning system/global system for mobile transmitters. Minimum convex polygons (MCPs),and 99% and 50% kernel density estimates (KDEs) were calculated for the breeding and non breeding seasons of the Cape Vulture. Land use maps were constructed for each 99% KDE and vulture locations were overlaid. During the non-breeding season, ranges were slightly larger(mean [± SE] MCP = 16 887 km2 ± 366 km2) than the breeding season (MCP = 14 707 km2 ± 2155 km2). Breeding and non-breeding season MCPs overlapped by a total of 92%. Kernel density estimates showed seasonal variability. During the breeding season, Cape Vultures used subsistence farmland, natural woodland and protected areas more than expected. In the non-breeding season, vultures used natural woodland and subsistence farmland more than expected, and protected areas less than expected. In both seasons, human-altered landscapes were used less, except for subsistence farmland.Conservation implications: These results highlight the importance of subsistence farm land to the survival of the Cape Vulture. Efforts should be made to minimise potential threats to vultures in the core areas outlined, through outreach programmes and mitigation measures.The conservation buffer of 40 km around Cape Vulture breeding colonies should be increased to 50 km.
 
Publisher AOSIS Publishing
 
Contributor University of KwaZulu-Natal Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency
Date 2015-05-18
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Minimum convex polygons (MCPs), kernel densities estimates (KDEs), land use mapping
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/koedoe.v57i1.1240
 
Source Koedoe; Vol 57, No 1 (2015); 11 pages 2071-0771 0075-6458
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1240/1761 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1240/1762 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1240/1763 https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1240/1753
 
Coverage southern Africa — radio telemetry, habitat use
Rights Copyright (c) 2015 Morgan B. Pfeiffer, Jan A. Venter, Colleen T. Downs https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT