The effect of the spatial positioning of items on the reliability of questionnaires measuring affect

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title The effect of the spatial positioning of items on the reliability of questionnaires measuring affect
 
Creator Leo, Leigh Kolsch, Sebastian Beukes, Azaria Crous, Freddie Scheepers, Johann
 
Subject Embodied cognition, questionnaire design, measuring affect embodied cognition; questionnaire design; spatial positioning; affect; relaibility; orientational metaphors
Description Orientation: Extant research has shown that the relationship between spatial location and affect may have pervasive effects on evaluation. In particular, experimental findings on embodied cognition indicate that a person is spatially orientated to position what is positive at the top and what is negative at the bottom (vertical spatial orientation), and to a lesser extent, to position what is positive on the left and what is negative on the right (horizontal spatial orientation). It is therefore hypothesised, that when there is congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the spatial positioning (layout) of a questionnaire, the reliability will be higher than in the case of incongruence.Research purpose: The principal objective of the two studies reported here was to ascertain the extent to which congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the layout of the questionnaire (spatial positioning of questionnaire items) may impact on the reliability of a questionnaire measuring affect.Motivation for the study: The spatial position of items on a questionnaire measuring affect may indirectly impact on the reliability of the questionnaire.Research approach, design and method: In both studies, a controlled experimental research design was conducted using a sample of university students (n = 1825).Major findings: In both experiments, evidence was found to support the hypothesis that greater congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the spatial positioning (layout) of a questionnaire leads to higher reliability on a questionnaire measuring affect.Practical implications: These findings may serve to create awareness of the influence of the spatial positioning of items as a confounding variable in questionnaire design.Contribution/value-add: Overall, this research complements previous studies by confirming the metaphorical representation of affect and enhances our understanding of embodiment-related conceptual processing and its subsequent influence on self-evaluations versus external evaluations on an unconscious level, specifically in relation to measuring affect.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor The University of Johannesburg
Date 2016-08-31
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — Controlled Experimental Resarch
Format text/html application/octet-stream text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1303
 
Source SA Journal of Industrial Psychology; Vol 42, No 1 (2016); 8 pages 2071-0763 0258-5200
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1303/1962 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1303/1963 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1303/1964 https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1303/1961
 
Coverage — — A total of 1825 participants completed the questionnaire online. The mean age of the participants was 21.2 years (SD = 4.08). There were 1045 women (57.3%).
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Leigh Leo, Sebastian Kolsch, Azaria Beukes, Freddie Crous, Johann Scheepers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT