Psychometric comparison of paper-and-pencil and online personality assessments in a selection setting

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

 
 
Field Value
 
Title Psychometric comparison of paper-and-pencil and online personality assessments in a selection setting
 
Creator Joubert, Tina Kriek, Hendrik J.
 
Subject Industrial Psychology; Psychological Assessment online assessment; personality questionnaire; equivalence; Occupational Personality Questionnaire; paper-and-pencil assessment
Description The goal of the study was to determine whether the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ32i) yielded comparable results when two different modes of administration, namely paper and-pencil and Internet- based administration, were used in real-life, high-stakes selection settings. Two studies were conducted in which scores obtained online in unproctored settings were compared with scores obtained during proctored paper-and-pencil settings. The psychometric properties of the paper-and-pencil and Internet-based applications were strikingly similar. Structural equation modelling with EQS indicated substantial support for the hypothesis that covariance matrices of the paper-and-pencil and online applications in both studies were identical. It was concluded that relationships between the OPQ32i scales were not affected by mode of administration or supervision.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2009-07-04
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — non-experimental quantitative research using a psychological instrument
Format application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajip.v35i1.727
 
Source SA Journal of Industrial Psychology; Vol 35, No 1 (2009); 11 pages 2071-0763 0258-5200
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/727/861
 
Coverage South Africa 2005 - 2006 2227 Students and 2109 Managers
Rights Copyright (c) 2009 Tina Joubert, Hendrik J. Kriek https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT