A formative evaluation of a staff reward and recognition programme

SA Journal of Human Resource Management

 
 
Field Value
 
Title A formative evaluation of a staff reward and recognition programme
 
Creator Salie, Saleemah Schlechter, Anton
 
Subject — theory evaluation; reward and recognition programme; staff motivation; staff retention; meaningful reward
Description Orientation: It is generally assumed that reward and recognition programmes have increased staff motivation and reduced staff turnover.Research purpose: The main aim of this evaluation was to test the plausibility of the programme theory underlying a staff reward and recognition programme within a retail setting. Secondary aims were to assess whether or not the programme was implemented as intended and whether or not its outcomes were well defined.Motivation for the study: Different groups of people may have different assumptions about whether a reward and recognition programme works or not. This evaluation was motivated by the different assumptions held by programme stakeholders, programme recipients and social science researchers regarding the programme.Research design, approach and method: This formative evaluation used a descriptive design. Primary qualitative data were collected by means of structured interviews with the Human Resource Development (HRD) Facilitator and ten programme participants.Main findings: The results showed that the programme theory was not plausible and that the programme was not implemented as intended. Although the HRD Facilitator and the participants agreed that the programme led to improved customer service, they disagreed about the other programme outcomes.Practical/managerial implications: This evaluation contains practical suggestions for improving the programme theory, the programme implementation process and the redefinition of the outcomes of the programme as standard performance indicators.Contribution/value-add: This evaluation contributed to the limited literature on the effect of reward and recognition programmes. Whilst there is a vast amount of literature pertaining to such programmes, very few formal evaluations exist about them.
 
Publisher AOSIS
 
Contributor
Date 2012-07-04
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — —
Format text/html application/epub+zip text/xml application/pdf
Identifier 10.4102/sajhrm.v10i3.422
 
Source SA Journal of Human Resource Management; Vol 10, No 3 (2012); 11 pages 2071-078X 1683-7584
 
Language eng
 
Relation
The following web links (URLs) may trigger a file download or direct you to an alternative webpage to gain access to a publication file format of the published article:

https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/422/462 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/422/478 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/422/463 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/422/448 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/downloadSuppFile/422/756 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/downloadSuppFile/422/757 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/downloadSuppFile/422/758 https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/downloadSuppFile/422/759
 
Coverage — — —
Rights Copyright (c) 2012 Saleemah Salie, Anton Schlechter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ADVERTISEMENT